Login

all posts tagged “Licensing”

Licensing Your Trademark - A Positive Alternative

Posted by: leelefever on August 24, 2010- 5:00pm

Categories: legal, Licensing, ourwork, strategy, trademark

For a couple of years now, through our work with videos, I’ve realized that licensing is an often neglected business model.  Not only is a potential revenue source, it’s a way to work with people in a positive and permission-based manner.

Patrick O’Keefe, author of Managing Online Forums, recently wrote a post that got me thinking.  It’s called “Rethinking the Cease and Desist - Don’t Threaten Fan Communities and Groups - License Your Brand to Them.”  Patrick is a professional community manager and has a lot of real-world experience in dealing with fan communities - and I think he’s 100% right.

I believe I have the solution. You have to control your trademark. You also don’t want to abuse your vibrant fan base. You feel you are between a rock and a hard place. The solution? License your brand to the site and/or it’s proprietors.
Provide them with a license allowing them to do what they are already doing.

Let’s take a step back and talk about the issue at-hand.  If you own a trademark, like “Common Craft” you must protect it.  If you don’t, you could lose the ability to protect it in the future.  For this reason, you have to be proactive. Unfortunately, enforcing a trademark can be messy.

If you’re a major brand, you have lawyers who are constantly scouring the web for people who use the trademark in illegal ways.  For instance, if I used the Coca-Cola logo to advertise my new drink, they would surely send me a nice letter.

For small companies, it’s sometimes not so simple.  While enforcing your trademark is your duty, you have the real potential of ruining the goodwill you’ve built among your customers and fans by handling the situation in a clumsy way.  

There are the obvious cases where an organization is clearly trying to create confusion by using your trademark to promote their own products.  This is an easy one - a cease-and-desist is often the only thing that will cause them to stop.

Most often though, the person or company violating the trademark (for example, using your logo without permission) does not have bad intentions. They are a fan who wants to use the trademark to help you - not take business from you.  This is a simple case of awareness.  They either didn’t know it was trademarked, or didn’t understand the basics of trademark law.  It’s these cases that are the hardest because a cease-and-desist will seem misplaced.

This is where licensing comes in.  As I’ve written before, licensing is the business of permission. You have the right to control your intellectual property, whether it’s your words, music, videos, logos, etc. and licensing is how that control is often managed. Trademark is a tool that makes licensing possible - they give you legal authority to control what you own.  

So, to Patrick’s point, what seems like a trademark violation may be a business opportunity, or a way to have a formal, productive relationship with fans.  

Let’s say one of your fans wants to start a blog about your brand.  Without asking, they grab a logo from the web and start a blog, maybe with the name of your company in the URL.  You notice it and realize that they are violating your trademark. The problem is confusion: people may confused their site with your site. Avoiding this confusion is part of why trademarks are important. Consumers need confidence that they are dealing with the genuine article. So, if you feel it's a risk, you have a choice. One is to stop them with a cease-and-desist, which will feel harsh to one of your biggest fans.  Another option is to go them and say something like:  

“Hey, I saw your blog and I’d love to see it continue.  As you may know, I own the trademark for the logo and title your using.  I’d like to work with you to keep using them, but I need to make sure that it’s clear who owns it.  For this reason, I’d like to license it to you.  This way, you have my explicit permission to use it and we can work together on how it’s used in the future.  I’ve attached a simple document that outlines how the relationship works.”

This is a more productive way to manage this situation.  There are a number of benefits:
    1.    You protect your trademark
    2.    You create a formal relationship with a big fan
    3.    You have the opportunity to make this a business

Every situation is different, but think about #3 above. Permission doesn’t have to come with a fee, but often it does.  You could easily say that using the logo (for example) costs X amount per year.  Before you know it, you’re making passive income based on your intellectual property -  and that’s a good business to be in.

Final Note:

Of course, we are not lawyers. If you have questions about trademark law, please talk to an attorney.  Here are a couple of links about trademark and trademark infringement:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark_infringement

http://www.copylaw.com/new_articles/trademrk.html

Richard Byrne Explains Why He'd Pay for a Free Video

Posted by: leelefever on July 28, 2010- 5:00pm

Categories: business, education, Licensing, strategy, teachers

Richard Byrne over at Free Tech for Teachers has been one of our biggest supporters in the edu-blogging world and was kind enough to highlight a few of our videos in a recent post called "Three Common Craft Videos That Should Be In Your Training Library."  In this post, Richard states:

I like Common Craft videos for the clear simplicity of their presentations. For that reason I actually purchase copies of the videos to save on my hard drive. I encourage you to do the same if you use their videos for trainings.

Apparently, this post caused some of his readers to ask an important question: Why would I buy something I can use for free? It's a question we hear from time-to-time and I think that Richard's response was one that we really appreciate.  In a follow-up post called Why Pay For a Free Video? He re-posts his answer from a previous post:

A couple of days ago I Tweeted that I was buying a copy of Common Craft's video Wikis in Plain English. The fact that I bought anything may come as a shock to some readers. After all, this is Free Technology for Teachers and you can watch all of the Common Craft videos for free at various places on the Internet. So why did I purchase Wikis in Plain English? I purchased a copy of it because I will be conducting some workshops over the next few months in which Wikis in Plain English will be useful. Since I will be getting paid for those workshops, using the free version of the Common Craft videos would not be right. Put another way, Lee and Sachi put a lot of their time and effort into the production of their videos, for me to profit from their work without paying for that work would be like stealing. Therefore, I bought a copy of Wikis in Plain English and will purchase other videos from Common Craft as needed. Unfortunately, there are a lot of people that haven't come to the same conclusion that I have and have abused the work of Lee and Sachi Lefever. Because of those abuses, the newest Common Craft video is not embeddable although you can still view it for free on Common Craft.

At the end of the day, we've made the choice to share less than half of our library on You Tube. In making that choice, we've left the decision up to the individual educator about how to proceed. Are happy for educators to use the YouTube versions, but we also want people to know that the videos we license do offer benefits that you won't find with YouTube.  Just to name a couple, they are high resolution and look great on projector screens. Further, they don't have any ads or watermarks.  They are designed for workshops and presentations and we work with schools on licensing all the time. Here's a case study.  

We always appreciate educators who do choose to license videos from us, for whatever reason.  It helps us keep making videos. We also understand that educators cannot always afford licensing and hope that the YouTube versions can be an option. In which case, we only ask that you help spread the word about our work and value it provides. 

Licensing Highlight: Verisign and Secure Websites

Posted by: leelefever on May 19, 2010- 5:00pm

Categories: business, Licensing, our work, verisign

Verisign is one of the most trusted names in the web security world and they've become a great example of how Common Craft videos can be put to work to educate customers.  Web security is often taken for granted and many people and organizations don't really understand what makes a website secure, or how to tell. Our video makes it simple for non-techies.

Verisign and Common Craft

As you can see above, we've licensed our Secure Websites video to Verisign for use as part of the their SSL Information Center.  We worked with them to create a custom version of the video that includes their brand at the beginning and end. Any Common Craft video can be customized in this way.

I highlight this relationship because it's a great example of how Common Craft videos can be used as educational resources.  This video happens to explore web security, but the same situation could be true for banks who want to educate customers about Phishing Scams or the basics of Investing Money or tech companies that need to explain Cloud Computing to novice users.  Customized or not, our videos are built and licensed for these purposes.

Recent Post Topics

Subscribe with RSS