all posts tagged “twitter”
This video was made from the raw, unedited footage from the making of Twitter Search in Plain English.
Watch another time-lapse Common Craft video shoot here.
Today we released a new video called "Twitter Search in Plain English"
The video uses an metaphor of the small town of "Twitterville." The town has an election and the people use Twitter to track real-time news, a hashtag to organize discussions and trends to find new information.
While it wasn't our intention, the video matches closely with the events currently taking place in Iran, where people are using Twitter to organize and share news about their disputed election.
If you know people who get Twitter, but don't understand things like hashtags and trending topics, this video will help.
Thanks to the folks at CNN Money for contacting us and asking permission to use our video (with attribution) in the segment below:
For the first time in Common Craft's evolution, one of our videos "Twitter in Plain English" is being used in the mainstream media. For the most part, we're excited to have our work in front of millions. However, it brings up some questions and we're curious what you think. A few facts:
- The video "Twitter in Plain English" is 100% Common Craft's property and is licensed with a Creative Commons non-commercial, no-derivatives license.
- Our names and a link to our web site appear at the end of the video
- The video is currently displayed from a link on the front page of Twitter.com
- Of the 5-6 media companies to use the video so far (examples below), only ABC contacted us first.
- Of the 5-6 media companies to use the video so far, only ABC has attributed Common Craft as the source.
- Snippets of the video are being used and sometimes the camera points at the video displayed at Twitter.com
So, media companies are using parts of our video/audio without permission or a licensing agreement. There is a big reason why this may be OK:
- Fair Use - Essentially, a small bit of copyrighted work may be used to educate the public. However, some instances seem to go beyond Fair Use.
Other reasons may include:
- Mistaken Ownership - Some may assume the video is owned by Twitter, Inc.
- Ignorance - Assuming that the video is in the public public domain.
Now, I'm not writing to make a big hairy deal about the use of the video. The truth is, we're not sure what's appropriate or what to expect. In a perfect world, when a company would like to use our video, or a portion thereof, we would expect:
- Attribution/Credit - We think it's fair to let the public know the source of the video
- A Licensing Agreement that outlines the relationship. We're not looking for money in most cases - just clarity in regards to intellectual property.
While we're assuming that most examples fall under Fair Use, we can't help but wonder if these companies are aware that there is a small company behind the video, a company that has rules and expectations?
I'm curious what you think. How should we view the broadcast use of our videos by mainstream media companies? What can we do to encourage proper attribution/licensing?
Examples:
ABC Nightline - Used with permission
ABC Good Morning America - Used with permission
NPR Unger Report - Exploring the Darker Side of Tweets and Twitter Liberal use of audio, no contact or attribution.
CNN International - No contact or attribution
CBS Sunday Morning - No contact or attribution
KOMO News (local Seattle station) No contact or attribution
A year ago today, I was writing the script for the video "Twitter in Plain English." A year later, the video has over 2.6 million views, thanks to a bit of collaboration between a handful of companies. Here's how:
We decided to make "Twitter in Plain English" for the same reason we made "RSS in Plain English " - it was a concept with huge potential that needed a better explanation. We wanted people to understand a resource that we value.
Twitter, Inc. didn't hire us to create the video and had no creative input on the project. However, I did share the video with Biz Stone and he saw opportunities. We made a simple deal where they could use it on their site and we retained all rights, etc.
Around April of 2008, this button appeared on Twitter.com, linking visitors to the video and our web site.

We loaded the video to a few hosts, like YouTube, Vimeo and dotSUB. Twitter chose to use the video player from dotSUB.com. If you're not aware of dotSUB, it's an amazing free service that enables any video to have subtitles in mutiple languages. Twitter embedded the dotSUB player and the ball began to roll.

Fast-forward to today and it's clear that the video has been a hit. Here's a graph of the daily views over the last year six months via dotSUB:

I think it's interesting to see the "hockey stick" formation over the last couple of months. My guess is that this is an indication of the growing number of people visiting Twitter.com. 2 million views on dotSUB are added to 600k on YouTube and 70k on Vimeo to get to 2.6 million overall views.
Michael Smolens, a friend and someone who founded dotSUB.com shared the stats this way, regarding the Twitter video on dotSUB:
The number of daily views is now at more than 30,000/day, up from 6,000/day 3 months ago. It is now in 53 languages, and is embedded on 3,397 different URLs.
Thanks to dotSUB's free, volunteer-based subtitling service, the video can be embedded and viewed with subtitles in 53 languages, making it accessible globally.
What I love about this story is that it's a win-win that's not predicated directly upon making money. We made the video on our own time. Twitter chose to use a free video service that opened the video to a global audience. Almost a year later, and Common Craft is getting a lot of referrals from Twitter.com and licensing deals, Twitter gets a video for explaining their service, dotSUB gets a perfect way to expose the value of their service and the people of the Web get a fun video that explains something that's difficult to understand. Win-win-win-win?
NOTE: In terms of our business model, Twitter is an exception, as we believe it is an exceptional product. At this stage in our evolution, I don't want to set the expectation that we will produce product-based videos on our own time.
I've been a Twitter user for just over 2 years now and I'm still trying to figure out how to
use it well. A couple of weeks ago, We created an @commoncraft account that's focused on our business and looks behind-the-scenes. Now that I have an established account (@leelefever) and one that's just getting started, I've been thinking a lot about what's possible with Twitter. Some thoughts:
(If you're new to Twitter, watch our video Twitter in Plain English )
To Follow or Not to Follow
I take a decidedly lightweight approach to social media. If I haven't met you or don't know you personally, I'm not likely to add you as a friend or follow you. I currently follow about 200 people on Twitter and it's still too much. When I follow someone with the @leelefever account, I try keep up with most of their updates. This is how I've always used Twitter.
Now that I have a new, business-oriented account, I'm thinking about it a bit differently. With the @commoncraft account we're following most, if not all, the folks who follow that account. This way, we can receive direct messages from these folks (Twitter members can only send direct messages to members that follow them.) Also, it creates a stream of Twitter updates that represent people interested in Common Craft. I realize I can't really follow everyone, but having the stream gives me a source that I can manage later. And, I think it's a nice gesture.
Reducing Twitter Administration
As you know, I'm all about reducing heavyweight administration. The @leelefever account gets about 10 new followers a day and it's rare to see someone I know personally. I've started filtering the emails to help me manage my inbox. The side effect of this is that I don't see every email and may miss people I want to follow.
Again, I'm trying something new with the @commoncraft account. For now, I'm trying out a service called Tweetlater that automatically follows people that follow @commoncraft and sends them a quick "thank you" message. It's not as personal as I'd like, and some spammers are using it for nefarious purposes, but it allows me to accomplish the goal of following people without having to take an action for every one. It's lightweight.
Other Tools
I've done little experimenting with the @leelefever account in terms of tools. I think there is part of me that wants it to be pure - like the Twitter I used 2 years ago. I've linked it up to my Facebook account and on my Tumblr, but I haven't tried any Twittering services.
With the @commoncraft account, I'm all about experimentation. Just recently I started using TwitPic to publish photos like this to the @commoncraft stream. I want to bring people into our daily work lives and TwitPic makes it easy to snap a picture with my phone and post it in seconds. I've also hooked the Common Craft blog into the Twitter stream using Twitterfeed.
Having Two Accounts - Which Tool?
How do you manage two accounts? Right now I use Tweetdeck for personal and the Twitter web site for Common Craft. I know Twhirl allows more than one login.
TweetDeck and Twitter Groups
I'm using TweetDeck for all my Twitter needs. I have a column for the people a follow, a column for replies and a few searches (more on searches later). A feature I haven't used in TweetDeck is the ability to create groups. With groups, I can take everyone I follow and filter the stream by into "family", "must read" or "news" for instance. Because I'm only following 200 people, this isn't as useful for the @leelefever account. One day I may start to slice and dice the people I follow via the @commoncraft account into groups.
Search
Twitter Search is an amazingly powerful tool. We both use a search query that gives us an constant stream of activity on Twitter related to what we do. It's designed to capture the key words and phrases, across both accounts. It looks like this:
commoncraft OR "common craft" OR leelefever OR lefever OR "plain english" (Link)
Redundant Content
Having two accounts presents some issues in terms of content. For instance, a lot of people follow the @leelefever account because they are interested in Common Craft. Now that they have an oppotunity to follow @commoncraft, I have to consider redundancy. Do I post links to blog posts on both accounts? It's going to take a little while to negotiate what goes where. What do you think?
I'm curious what you think about these points. Is your use of Twitter similar to one of these models? What else should I be considering?
Perhaps you'd like to follow us? We're @commoncraft, @sachilefever and @leelefever. Also, here's a post I wrote after one year: Twittering for 1 year: a Retrospective.
My most recent Tweet (a short update to the Twitter service) was this:
- Today's my twitterversary! 1 year of meaningless drivel flowing from my keyboard and phone. I still count it as time well-spent. about 4 hours ago from TwitBin
It's true. I've been using Twitter for one year as of today and I've been thinking about it. What does Twitter mean to me? Why have I adopted it?
First - a bit of explanation. Twitter provides a way for you (and your
friends) to share short updates about your daily life. It's free and you can use a mobile phone or the Internet to post these updates and follow the updates of people you choose.
So, my thoughts...
Twitter has become part of my online life. Whenever my browser is open, the left side of it displays the updates from my friends via TwitBin. I follow the updates of about 100 people, most of which I know. About 300 people follow my updates and I've posted close to 500 updates in a year.
The beauty of Twitter is how lightweight it is. It makes blogging feel heavy and cumbersome. Because you are limited to 140 characters, you can only say so much in an update. This takes away the anxiety and time it takes to blog. You can go from a thought to sharing it in seconds.
Speaking of blogging, Twitter has impacted my blog reading. I abandoned my RSS reader for a couple of months without too much thought. I think Twitter became my surrogate RSS reader - it gave me the connections and discoveries that I found with blog reading - without the fuss. I've recently cranked up Google Reader again.
Twitter has impacted my relationships. 140 characters at a time, I've gotten to know my online (and real-world) friends much better. Daily life is the only real life and Twitter shines a spotlight on it.
Twitter is new, but the concept is forever. Twitter opened up a layer of information that never really existed before online. It's a type of information that has meaning in the context of friends as it asks: what are you doing right now? Whether it's Twitter or some other service, this layer will persist from now on.
Twitter's growth and adoption is related to it's low barrier to entry. I have a number of friends who may have never started a blog, but jumped right in to Twitter. Why? Because there isn't much a learning curve. Everyone knows what they are doing right now and Twitter makes it easy to share.
Twitter isn't for everyone. There is a lot of noise and crap. But, if you can find people you know and have a way to integrate the updates into your life, you may be addicted.
Twitter enables a new kind of news that's nearly real-time and uniquely on-the-ground. I was fascinated watching Nate Ritter use Twitter to track the events around the San Diego fires. Mainstream media can't do what Nate was doing.
So, I'm a fan and I plan to use Twitter as long as my friends do.
We adopted Twitter at the very end of a year-long trip and some of my favorite Twitter memories are from sharing updates as we approached home after a year away.
The very first update (that also highlights my persistent typos and misspellings):
- Just about to watch Momento in an apartment in Barcelona.11:32 AM November 21, 2006 from web
After Spain we arrived in the US and drove across the US to Seattle...
- Feelin the love from the family in North Carolina. 05:53 AM November 29, 2006 from txt
- Turning right onto "Preacher Smith Rd. " in Rome Georgia... 08:35 AM December 02, 2006
- Has officially entered wile e. coyote country. Beep beep. Flagstaf 162 miles. 10:39 AM December 05, 2006
- Just passed Talent, Oregon. The local cops drive cars that say "Talent Police" according to Sachi's eyewitness acount. 11:06 AM December 11, 2006 from txt
- Seeing the Seattle skyline for the first time in a year. We cannot sit still. Smiles and deep breathes all around. I wonder what awaits us now. 06:19 PM December 11, 2006
- We are arriving on our street serenaded by Nirvana - Smells like Teen Spirit. Welcome to Seattle. 06:36 PM December 11, 2006 from txt
- 2007 - you are my bitch. 11:56 PM December 31, 2006 from txt
Perhaps you'd like to follow me on Twitter?




